BIOLOGIC DISEASE-MODIFYING ANTIRHEUMATIC DRUGS (BDMARDS) IN THE TREATMENT OF RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS: EFFICACY, SAFETY, AND MODERN APPROACHES

Authors

  • Tolibova Jasmina Jo'rabekovna Student of Samarkand State Medical University tolibovajasmin15@gmail.com Author
  • Akbarova Munisa Sherzod qizi Student of Samarkand State Medical University akbarovamunesa@gmail.com Author
  • Pardayeva Azizabonu Ulug'bek qizi Student of Samarkand State Medical University azilider290@gmail.com Author
  • Bakhtiyorjonova Azizabonu Bakhtiyorjon qizi Student of Samarkand State Medical University azizabaxtiyorjonova7@gmail.com Author

Keywords:

Rheumatoid arthritis, biologic DMARD, TNF inhibitors, IL-6 inhibitors, rituximab, abatacept, JAK inhibitors, biosimilars, safety.

Abstract

Background: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune disease in which biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs/tsDMARDs) have become an integral stage of care when conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs), primarily methotrexate, fail to achieve adequate control. These agents act at defined points in the immunopathogenic cascade, reducing disease activity and preventing structural damage.

Methods: This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on the mechanisms of action, clinical efficacy, safety profile, and modern selection strategies for bDMARDs/tsDMARDs, drawing on the 2022/2023 EULAR recommendations and major randomized controlled trials.

Results: TNF inhibitors, IL-6 receptor inhibitors, the T-cell costimulation blocker abatacept, the B-cell depleting agent rituximab, and JAK inhibitors act at distinct points in the immune cascade and produce comparable ACR20/50/70 response rates. Safety profiles differ by class: infection risk is common to all bDMARDs, while JAK inhibitors carry particular concern for venous thromboembolism and cardiovascular risk, IL-6 inhibitors for gastrointestinal perforation and lipid changes, and rituximab for hepatitis B reactivation. Modern practice emphasizes individualized selection based on comorbidities, cost reduction through the availability of biosimilars, and gradual dose tapering once sustained remission is achieved.

Conclusion: Biologic and targeted synthetic DMARDs represent a qualitative advance in RA treatment, but their safe and effective use requires thorough screening, regular monitoring, and individualized patient selection — an approach that, with the expanding availability of biosimilars, is increasingly feasible even in resource-constrained systems such as Uzbekistan's.

References

[1] Smolen JS, Landewe RBM, Bergstra SA, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2022 update. Ann Rheum Dis. 2023;82(1):3-18.

[2] Singh JA, Saag KG, Bridges SL Jr, et al. 2015 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2016;68(1):1-25.

[3] Maini R, St Clair EW, Breedveld F, et al. Infliximab (chimeric anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha monoclonal antibody) versus placebo in rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving concomitant methotrexate: a randomised phase III trial (ATTRACT). Lancet. 1999;354(9194):1932-1939.

[4] Weinblatt ME, Keystone EC, Furst DE, et al. Adalimumab, a fully human anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha monoclonal antibody, for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in patients taking concomitant methotrexate: the ARMADA trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;48(1):35-45.

[5] Emery P, Breedveld FC, Hall S, et al. Comparison of methotrexate monotherapy with a combination of methotrexate and etanercept in active early moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (COMET): a randomised, double-blind, parallel treatment trial. Lancet. 2008;372(9636):375-382.

[6] Emery P, Keystone E, Tony HP, et al. IL-6 receptor inhibition with tocilizumab improves treatment outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis refractory to anti-tumour necrosis factor biologicals: results from a 24-week multicentre randomised placebo-controlled trial (RADIATE). Ann Rheum Dis. 2008;67(11):1516-1523.

[7] Cohen SB, Emery P, Greenwald MW, et al. Rituximab for rheumatoid arthritis refractory to anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial (REFLEX). Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54(9):2793-2806.

[8] Genovese MC, Becker JC, Schiff M, et al. Abatacept for rheumatoid arthritis refractory to tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibition (ATTAIN). N Engl J Med. 2005;353(11):1114-1123.

[9] Schiff M, Weinblatt ME, Valente R, et al. Head-to-head comparison of subcutaneous abatacept versus adalimumab for rheumatoid arthritis: two-year efficacy and safety findings from AMPLE trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(1):86-94.

[10] Ytterberg SR, Bhatt DL, Mikuls TR, et al. Cardiovascular and cancer risk with tofacitinib in rheumatoid arthritis (ORAL Surveillance). N Engl J Med. 2022;386(4):316-326.

[11] Curtis JR, Singh JA. Use of biologics in rheumatoid arthritis: current and emerging paradigms of care. Clin Ther. 2011;33(6):679-707.

[12] Kay J, Smolen JS. Biosimilars to treat inflammatory arthritis: the challenge of proving identity. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72(10):1589-1593.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-05