SOCIO-ORGANIZATIONAL FACTORS OF REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH AND ACCESS TO OBSTETRIC CARE
Keywords:
Reproductive health; obstetric care access; antenatal care; rural–urban disparities; health literacy; patient–provider communication; UzbekistanAbstract
Reproductive health outcomes are strongly influenced by social context and the organization of health services, particularly in settings with marked rural–urban differences.To assess women’s awareness of reproductive health, reproductive attitudes, and socio-organizational barriers affecting access to and quality of obstetric care in Uzbekistan. A cross-sectional survey using a standardized questionnaire was conducted in 2025 among 5,000 women aged 15–49 years residing in different regions of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Data covered socio-demographic characteristics, fertility intentions, pregnancy planning practices, antenatal follow-up, and patient–provider communication. Most respondents were aged 20–34 years, reflecting peak reproductive age. A substantial proportion lived in rural areas (62.1%), highlighting potential geographic inequities in service access. While 62.5% reported current or future fertility intentions, only 39.2% discussed pregnancy planning with healthcare professionals. Antenatal follow-up was most commonly received in polyclinics (72.3%), with 12.4% using private clinics. Counseling on pregnancy danger signs was reported by 48.3%, whereas 32.1% stated it was not provided. Patient experience indicators suggested gaps in communication: 41.2% reported clear explanations, 61.8% reported respectful treatment, and only 35.4% were able to ask questions and receive detailed answers; 42.6% confirmed confidentiality of medical information.
The findings indicate persistent information deficits and service-quality gaps, particularly in counseling, patient engagement, and confidentiality, with rural residence potentially exacerbating barriers. Strengthening patient-centered communication, standardized counseling protocols, and targeted reproductive health education—especially in rural areas—may improve access and quality of obstetric care
References
1. Babazhanova Sh., Dzhabbarova Yu.K., Lyubchich N.I. Main causes and structure of maternal mortality according to a confidential investigation in the Republic of Uzbekistan. Medical Journal of Uzbekistan. 2018;(6):64–66.
2. Babazhanova Sh.D., Lyubchich N.I., Dzhabbarova Yu.K. Confidential analysis of critical incidents in obstetric practice: Methodological guidelines. Tashkent; 2019. 42 p.
3. Lyubchich A.S. Achievements and prospects of the perinatal service in the Republic of Uzbekistan. In: Journal of Theoretical and Clinical Medicine. Proceedings of the 1st Scientific and Practical Conference with International Participation “Current Issues in Perinatal Medicine,” October 9–10, 2019. Tashkent; 2019;(5):11–13.
4. Rizaye Zh.A., Agababyan L.R., Davlyatova A., et al. Oral cavity status in primigravidae. Journal of Reproductive Health and Uro-Nephrological Research. 2023;(4):7–11.
5. World Health Organization. (2012). The WHO application of ICD-10 to deaths during pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium: ICD-MM.
6. World Health Organization. (2013). Maternal death surveillance and response: Technical guidance—Information for action to prevent maternal death (ISBN 978-92-4-150608-3).
7. World Health Organization. (2015). Strategies toward ending preventable maternal mortality (EPMM).

