ADVANCED METHODS OF ASSESSMENT

Authors

  • Dildora Eshmurodova Teacher Shahrisabz State Pedagogical Institute Author
  • Khomidova Nozima Student Shahrisabz State Pedagogical Institute Author

Keywords:

Assessment, formative assessment, peer assessment, competency-based assessment, e-assessment, learning outcomes, higher education.

Abstract

Assessment methods in education have evolved significantly in recent decades, moving from traditional approaches to advanced, more dynamic models that better capture students' abilities. This article explores various advanced methods of assessment, such as formative assessment, peer assessment, e-assessment, and competency-based assessment, and their efficacy in different learning environments. Through a comprehensive literature review, we assess the benefits, challenges, and implications of these modern techniques. The findings from empirical studies show that advanced assessment methods lead to improved learning outcomes and greater student engagement when implemented correctly. This paper concludes by offering suggestions for integrating advanced assessment methods into educational practice and policy.

References

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and Classroom Learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7-74. doi:10.1080/0969595980050102

2. Topping, K. J. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249-276. doi:10.3102/00346543068003249

3. Voorhees, R. A. (2001). Competency-based learning models: A necessary future. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2001(110), 5-13. doi:10.1002/ir.7

4. Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218. doi:10.1080/03075070600572090

5. Crisp, G. T. (2007). The e-assessment handbook. Continuum International Publishing Group.

6. Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119-144. doi:10.1007/BF00117714

7. Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does (4th ed.). Open University Press.

8. Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2004). Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1, 3-31.

9. Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2006). Aligning assessment with long‐term learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(4), 399-413. doi:10.1080/02602930600679050

10. JISC. (2010). Effective assessment in a digital age: A guide to technology-enhanced assessment and feedback. Joint Information Systems Committee. Retrieved from https://www.jisc.ac.uk/guides/assessment-and-feedback

11. Andrade, H. L. (2019). A critical review of research on student self-assessment. Frontiers in Education, 4, 87. doi:10.3389/feduc.2019.00087

12. Gikandi, J. W., Morrow, D., & Davis, N. E. (2011). Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2333-2351. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.004

Downloads

Published

2025-06-06