SECURECALL: A DTMF-BASED CHALLENGE–RESPONSE CALLER ID VERIFICATION SYSTEM FOR MITIGATING TELEPHONE FRAUD
Keywords:
caller ID spoofing, challenge–response authentication, DTMF signalling, telephone fraud, STIR/SHAKEN, PKI-free verification, replay protection.Abstract
Caller ID spoofing underlies a large and growing share of telephone-based fraud (“vishing”) worldwide: authorised push payment (APP) fraud cost United Kingdom victims over £629 million in the first half of 2025 alone, a year-on-year rise exceeding 17% [2], while recorded cybercrime in Uzbekistan — overwhelmingly phone-based payment-card and bank-impersonation fraud — has grown roughly 68-fold over five years, with an estimated US$159 million stolen [3]. Carrier-level defences such as STIR/SHAKEN authenticate the network segment that carried a call rather than the caller's right to the displayed number, depend on a public-key infrastructure (PKI) that is difficult to deploy outside IP telephony, and leave SS7/PSTN legs largely unprotected [4]. This paper formalises and evaluates SecureCall, a PKI-free caller ID verification (CIV) system that authenticates callers through a dual-tone multi-frequency (DTMF) challenge–response exchange at the SIP/media-server layer, extending the architecture of Wang et al. [1] and a working Linphone/Asterisk prototype whose digit-handling logic passes a full (4/4) automated test suite. A verification decision function and a replay-protection invariant are defined over the challenge–response record, and system latency is decomposed consistently with the 4.7–29 second end-to-end delays and 10⁻⁴–10⁻⁶ forgery probabilities reported for CIV [1]. The analysis indicates that a software-only, PKI-free scheme of this kind is architecturally better suited to telecom environments, such as Uzbekistan's, that still mix IP, SS7 and card-payment rails.
References
[1] Wang, S., Delavar, M., Azad, M. A., Nabizadeh, F., Smith, S., & Hao, F. (2023). Spoofing against spoofing: Toward caller ID verification in heterogeneous telecommunication systems. ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security, 27(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1145/3625546
[2] UK Finance. (2025). Half Year Fraud Update 2025. UK Finance.
[3] Uralov, S. S. (2025). Analysis of fraud committed through information technologies. International Journal of Law and Criminology, 5(8), 52–56. https://doi.org/10.37547/ijlc/Volume05Issue08-10
[4] Peterson, J., Jennings, C., Rescorla, E., & Wendt, C. (2018). Authenticated Identity Management in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP). RFC 8224, IETF. https://doi.org/10.17487/RFC8224
[5] National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2025). Digital Identity Guidelines: Authentication and Authenticator Management. NIST Special Publication 800-63B-4. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-63b-4

