THE INFLUENCE OF SOCIAL MEDIA ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE CONTEMPORARY RUSSIAN LANGUAGE
Keywords:
social media, contemporary Russian, digital communication, neologisms, Anglicisms, language economy, emoji.Abstract
Social media has become one of the most productive environments for linguistic innovation. This article examines how digital communication influences the contemporary Russian language, with particular attention to lexical borrowing, neologisation, word formation, semantic change, language economy, graphic variation, and multimodality. The study applies descriptive, contextual, and comparative methods to representative examples of Russian-language online discourse and interprets them in relation to current research on computer-mediated communication. The analysis shows that social media does not merely introduce isolated fashionable words. It activates systematic processes at several levels of language: English lexical items are phonologically and grammatically adapted; borrowed stems become bases for Russian derivation; familiar words acquire digital meanings; abbreviated spelling, hashtags, emoji, and other visual signs perform pragmatic functions; and code-switching helps users express identity and group affiliation. At the same time, informal digital conventions may create difficulties when they are transferred into academic or professional writing. It is therefore more accurate to view social-media language not as a direct threat to Russian, but as a rapidly developing functional register whose influence depends on communicative context, audience, and users’ linguistic competence.
References
Crystal, D. (2006). Language and the Internet (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Dresner, E., & Herring, S. C. (2010). Functions of the nonverbal in CMC: Emoticons and illocutionary force. Communication Theory, 20(3), 249–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2010.01362.x
Herring, S. C., & Androutsopoulos, J. (2015). Computer-mediated discourse 2.0. In D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton, & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (2nd ed., pp. 127–151). Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584194.ch6
Ivanova, M. V., & Klushina, N. I. (2021). Russian language in modern web space: Dynamic processes and development trends. Russian Language Studies, 19(4), 367–382. https://doi.org/10.22363/2618-8163-2021-19-4-367-382
Kjose, A., & Bekar, M. (2024). Language economy: Abbreviations and emoji in social media. Facta Universitatis, Series: Linguistics and Literature, 22(1), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.22190/FULL240411011K
Muravyev, N., Panchenko, A., & Obiedkov, S. (2018). Neologisms on Facebook. arXiv:1804.05831. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1804.05831
Tagliamonte, S. A., & Denis, D. (2008). Linguistic ruin? LOL! Instant messaging and teen language. American Speech, 83(1), 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-2008-001
Thurlow, C., & Brown, A. (2003). Generation Txt? The sociolinguistics of young people’s text-messaging. Discourse Analysis Online, 1(1).

