SHAPING PUBLIC OPINION: THE ROLE OF ALGORITHMS IN CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF DIGITAL GATEKEEPING

Authors

  • Nurmuhammedova Muslima Oybek qizi Student, Department “Philology and Foreign Languages” Diplomat University in Tashkent Author
  • Mamadjanova Dildora Ulugbek kizi Scientific advisor Author

Keywords:

Algorithms, public opinion, social media, Filter Bubbles, Echo Chambers, Digital Gatekeeping.

Abstract

In the contemporary digital ecosystem, the dissemination of information is no longer   governed solely by traditional editorial gatekeepers. Instead, algorithmic architectures of major social media platforms dictate  the visibility of content, thereby playing  a pivotal role in shaping opinion. This article examines the mechanisms through which recommendation algorithms influence social perception. the cognitive biases they exploit, and the subsequent socio-political implications, including polarization and the proliferation of echo chambers, through a qualitative synthesis of current literature, the study demonstrates that engagement-maximization models may  distort the public sphere by prioritizing sensationalism over veracity.

References

1. Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L. A. (2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. *Science*, 348(6239), 1130-1132.

2. Gillespie, T. (2014). The relevance of algorithms. *Media technologies: Essays on communication, materiality, and society*, 167.

3. Gillespie, T. (2018). *Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media*. Yale University Press.

4. McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. *Public Opinion Quarterly*, 36(2), 176-187.

5. Napoli, P. M. (2019). *Social media and the public interest: Media regulation in the disinformation age*. Columbia University Press.

6. Pariser, E. (2011). *The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You*. Penguin Press.

7. Pew Research Center. (2024). *Reports on social media algorithms and public trust*. Pew Research.

8. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. (2025). *Digital news report: Algorithmic curation and media consumption*. RISJ.

9. Sunstein, C. R. (2018). *#Republic: Divided democracy in the age of social media*. Princeton University Press.

10. Tufekci, Z. (2015). Algorithmic harms beyond Facebook and Google: An analysis of the social, cultural, and political impacts of predictive algorithms. *Colorado Technology Law Journal*, 13, 163.

11. Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. *Science*, 359(6380), 1146-1151.

12. Zuboff, S. (2019). *The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power*. PublicAffairs.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-17