EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF AGILE PROJECT MANAGEMENT IN EDUCATIONAL PRACTICE: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY
Keywords:
Agile project management, project-based learning, student engagement, Scrum, Kanban, competency development, educational innovation, experimental researchAbstract
Fast changes in today’s schools call for lessons that get students moving, working together, yet building real abilities. Into this space steps a look at how Agile methods might shape classroom work. One setup tested two batches of learners - same goals, different paths. On one side, a team used old-style project tasks without special structure. On the opposite, another crew broke work into short cycles, tracked progress on boards, adjusted weekly. Learning unfolded in bursts, marked by check-ins, visible charts, shared duties. Not every method fits all, but patterns emerged from the way tasks were handled. Progress wasn’t just about results - it showed in how students stepped up, stayed tuned, reshaped plans.
Twelve weeks into the term, student progress in grades, drive, class involvement, and skill growth came under review. Those using Agile methods pulled ahead in achievement while showing sharper collaboration and thinking skills than peers not using them. Learning through Agile seems to boost how well students pick up knowledge - also building real-world abilities today’s jobs demand.
References
1. Anderson, D. J. (2010). Kanban: Successful evolutionary change for your technology business. Blue Hole Press.
2. Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 83(2), 39–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650903505415
3. Bell, S., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2008). Active learning in teams: A theoretical framework and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 118–130. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.118
4. Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3–4), 369–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653139
5. Grant, M. M. (2002). Getting a grip on project-based learning: Theory, cases and recommendations. Meridian: A Middle School Computer Technologies Journal, 5(1).
6. Kerzner, H. (2013). Project management: A systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling (11th ed.). Wiley.
7. Markham, T. (2011). Project-based learning: A bridge just far enough. Teacher Librarian, 39(2), 38–42.
8. Project Management Institute (PMI). (2017). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) (6th ed.). Project Management Institute.
9. Schwaber, K., & Sutherland, J. (2020). The Scrum guide: The definitive guide to Scrum: The rules of the game. Scrum.org. https://scrumguides.org
10. Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. Autodesk Foundation.
