THE EVOLUTION OF FAMILY MEDIATION: A GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE ON LEGAL FRAMEWORKS
Keywords:
Family mediation; Alternative dispute resolution; International legal frameworks; Comparative law; Cross-border family disputes; Hague Convention; UNCITRAL Model Law; Mediation legislation; Family law reform; Cultural competence; Online dispute resolution; Access to justice; Child-focused mediation; Mediator training; Enforcement of mediated agreementsAbstract
This article offers a thorough examination of the global evolution of family mediation, emphasizing the principal international legal frameworks that have influenced its growth and execution. As family mediation receives growing acknowledgment as an alternative to conventional litigation for settling familial conflicts, its incorporation into diverse legal frameworks globally has emerged as a topic of considerable interest. This study analyzes the influence of international legal instruments on family mediation practices, investigating the various approaches and integrations of this dispute resolution method across different nations. The study emphasizes the increasing inclination towards mediation in family law issues and assesses its efficacy in resolving intricate familial disputes across various cultural and legal frameworks
References
[1] Folberg, J., Milne, A. L., & Salem, P. (2004). Divorce and family mediation: Models, techniques, and applications. Guilford Press.
[2] Kelly, J. B. (1996). A decade of divorce mediation research: Some answers and questions. Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 34(3), 373-385.
[3] Parkinson, L. (2014). Family mediation. Jordan Publishing.
[4] Field, R. (2006). Using the feminist critique of mediation to explore "the good, the bad and the ugly" implications for women of the introduction of mandatory family dispute resolution in Australia. Australian Journal of Family Law, 20(5), 45-78.
[5] Emery, R. E., Sbarra, D., & Grover, T. (2005). Divorce mediation: Research and reflections. Family Court Review, 43(1), 22-37.
[6] Grillo, T. (1991). The mediation alternative: Process dangers for women. Yale Law Journal, 100(6), 1545-1610.
[7] Vigers, S. (2011). Mediating international child abduction cases: The Hague Convention. Hart Publishing.
[8] Hague Conference on Private International Law. (2012). Guide to good practice under the Hague Convention of 25 October 1980 on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction: Mediation.
[9] United Nations Commission on International Trade Law. (2002). UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Conciliation.
[10] European Parliament and Council. (2008). Directive 2008/52/EC on certain aspects of mediation in civil and commercial matters.
[11] Ricci, I. (2004). Court-based mandatory mediation: Special considerations. In J. Folberg, A. L. Milne, & P. Salem (Eds.), Divorce and family mediation: Models, techniques, and applications (pp. 397-419). Guilford Press.
[12] Family Procedure Rules 2010, Practice Direction 3A - Family Mediation Information and Assessment Meetings (MIAMs) (UK).
[13] Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) s 60I (Australia).
[14] Mediation Act 2012 (Mediationsgesetz) (Germany).
[15] Ono, A. (2011). Family mediation in Japan. In A. K. C. Koo (Ed.), Family law and practice in Hong Kong (pp. 369-385). Sweet & Maxwell.
[16] Shaw, L. A. (2010). Divorce mediation outcome research: A meta-analysis. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 27(4), 447-467.
[17] Emery, R. E. (2012). Renegotiating family relationships: Divorce, child custody, and mediation. Guilford Press.
[18] Kourlis, R. L., Taylor, M., Schepard, A., & Pruett, M. K. (2013). IAALS' Honoring Families Initiative: Courts and communities helping families in transition arising from separation or divorce. Family Court Review, 51(3), 351-376.
[19] Goldberg, S. B., Sander, F. E., Rogers, N. H., & Cole, S. R. (2012). Dispute resolution: Negotiation, mediation, arbitration, and other processes. Wolters Kluwer Law & Business.
[20] Bancroft, L. (2002). Why does he do that? Inside the minds of angry and controlling men. Berkley Books.
[21] Nolan-Haley, J. M. (2013). Mediation: The "new arbitration". Harvard Negotiation Law Review, 17, 61-95.
[22] Permanent Bureau of the Hague Conference on Private International Law. (2019). Report of the Experts' Group on the co-operation and cross-border recognition and enforcement of agreements in family matters involving children.
[23] Moloney, L., & Smyth, B. (2004). Family relationship centres in Australia: Reflections based on research and practice. Family Court Review, 51(2), 214-224.
[24] Kaspiew, R., Gray, M., Weston, R., Moloney, L., Hand, K., & Qu, L. (2009). Evaluation of the 2006 family law reforms. Australian Institute of Family Studies.
[25] Qu, L., & Weston, R. (2010). Parenting dynamics after separation: A follow-up study of parents who separated after the 2006 family law reforms. Australian Institute of Family Studies.
[26] Skjørten, K. (2005). Mediation—a good alternative to court proceedings in family matters? In M. Maclean (Ed.), Family law and family values (pp. 119-134). Hart Publishing.
[27] Gulbrandsen, W., & Tjersland, O. A. (2013). Mandatory mediation outside the court: A process and effect study. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 30(3), 307-330.
[28] Ng, Y. L. (2019). Family justice courts—Innovations, initiatives and programmes: An evolution over time. Singapore Academy of Law Journal, 31, 778-817.
[29] Quek Anderson, D. (2018). A coming of age for mediation in Singapore? Singapore Academy of Law Journal, 30, 1-28.
[30] International Social Service. (2014). Mediation in international family conflict and child abduction: The cross-border mediator network.
[31] Hague Conference on Private International Law. (2019). Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters.
[32] Katsh, E., & Rabinovich-Einy, O. (2017). Digital justice: Technology and the internet of disputes. Oxford University Press.
[33] European Commission. (2014). Cross-border family mediation: EU practice and law. Directorate-General for Internal Policies.
[34] Zeleznikow, J. (2017). Can artificial intelligence and online dispute resolution enhance efficiency and effectiveness in courts. International Journal for Court Administration, 8(2), 30-45.
[35] Hertz, F. (2008). Working with gay and lesbian families in mediation. In J. Folberg, A. L. Milne, & P. Salem (Eds.), Divorce and family mediation: Models, techniques, and applications (pp. 327-341). Guilford Press.
[36] Ervasti, K. (2018). Past, present and future of mediation in Nordic countries. In C. Esplugues & L. Marquis (Eds.), New developments in civil and commercial mediation (pp. 557-581). Springer.
[37] United Nations Development Programme. (2016). Access to justice and rule of law. Annual report 2015.
[38] Emery, R. E., Laumann-Billings, L., Waldron, M. C., Sbarra, D. A., & Dillon, P. (2001). Child custody mediation and litigation: Custody, contact, and coparenting 12 years after initial dispute resolution. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69(2), 323-332.
[39] Alexander, N. (2009). International and comparative mediation: Legal perspectives. Kluwer Law International.
