ROBOTIC SURGERY IN ONCOLOGICAL UROLOGY: OPPORTUNITIES AND LIMITATIONS

Authors

  • Omonov Azimbek G‘ayrat o‘g‘li Alfraganus University, Faculty of Medicine 4th-Year Medical Student Author
  • Quylanov Bahtiyor Scientific Supervisor Author

Keywords:

robotic surgery, oncological urology, prostate cancer, kidney cancer, bladder cancer, minimally invasive surgery, surgical outcomes, precision, recovery, limitations

Abstract

The article is devoted to robotic surgery in oncological urology: opportunities and limitations. Robotic-assisted surgery has become increasingly prominent in the management of urological cancers, including prostate, kidney, and bladder malignancies. This study examines the advantages of robotic systems, such as enhanced precision, reduced blood loss, shorter hospital stays, and faster recovery, as well as their limitations, including high cost, learning curve, and equipment availability. The work emphasizes the importance of evaluating patient outcomes, surgical efficiency, and long-term oncological effectiveness to determine the role of robotic technology in modern urological oncology.

References

1. Menon M., Tewari A., Peabody J., et al. Vattikuti Institute Prostatectomy: Technique and Outcomes. Urol Clin North Am, 2004;31:701–717.

2. Patel V. R., Tully A., Thaly R., et al. Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: Current Status and Future Directions. Eur Urol, 2005;47:640–649.

3. Kaouk J. H., Aron M., Goel R., et al. Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: Technique and Outcomes. Eur Urol, 2008;54:1326–1334.

4. Guru K. A., Hemal A. K., Menon M. Robotic-Assisted Radical Cystectomy: Current Perspectives. Curr Opin Urol, 2010;20:62–68.

5. Autorino R., Kaouk J. H., Haber G. P., et al. Robotics in Urologic Oncology: Past, Present, and Future. Curr Opin Urol, 2011;21:99–107.

6. European Association of Urology (EAU). EAU Guidelines on Urological Cancers. Arnhem, 2023.

Published

2025-09-29