ZAMONAVIY TA'LIM JARAYONIDA "AYLANMA SINF (FLIPPED CLASSROOM)" MODELINING AHAMIYATI VA UNI OLIY TA’LIMNING TURLI BOSQICHLARIDA JORIY QILISH
Keywords:
aylanma sinf, ta’lim bosqichlari, aralash ta’lim, texnologik uzluksizlik.Abstract
Mazkur maqolada zamonaviy ta’lim jarayonida “Aylanma sinf” (Flipped Classroom) texnologiyasidan foydalanish masalalari yoritilgan. Unda bakalavriat, magistratura va doktorantura bosqichlarida mazkur texnologiyaning qo‘llanish xususiyatlari, uning samaradorligi hamda talabalarning mustaqil ta’lim olish jarayoniga ijobiy ta’siri tahlil qilingan. Shuningdek, umr bo‘yi ta’lim konsepsiyasi va aralash ta’lim modeli bilan uzviy bog‘liqligi ham ko‘rib chiqiladi.
References
1. Bergmann J., Sams A. Flip Your Classroom: Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day. International Society for Technology in Education Publ., 2012. 120 p.
2. Bergmann J., Sams A. Flipping for Mastery. Educational Leadership, 2014, vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 24–29.
3. Bishop J., Verleger M. Testing the Flipped Classroom with Model-Eliciting Activities and Video Lectures in a Mid-Level Undergraduate Engineering Course. Frontiers in Education Conference, 2013, pp. 161–163.
4. Bishop J., Verleger M. The Flipped Classroom: A Survey of the Research. ASEE National Conference Proceedings, 2013, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 1–18
5. Boronenko G.F. [Mind Map as an Independent Foreign Language Learning Method]. Nauka YuURGU. Материалы 68-й научной конференции [Science of South Ural State University. Materials of the 68th Scientific Conference], 2016, pp. 865–870. (in Russ.)
6. Bryan T., Shestakova L., Volchenkova K.N. A Center for Academic Writing at South Ural State University: Which Model to Choose? 8th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, 2016, pp. 299–307.
7. Bryan A., Volchenkova K.N. Blended Learning: Definition, Models, Implications for
8. Higher Education. Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Ser. Education. Pedagogy, 2016, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 24–30.
9. Журинский А.Н. История зарубежной педагогики: учебное пособие для вузов. [History of International Pedagogy: a Textbook for Colleges]. Moscow, Forum Infra-M Publ., 1998. 272 p.
10. Holec H. Autonomy and Foreign Language Learning. Oxford, Pergamon Press Publ., 1981. 51 p.
11. Johnson L., Renner J. Effect of the Flipped Classroom Model on a Secondary Computer Applications Course: Student and Teacher Perceptions, Questions and Student Achievement. Unpublished. Diss. Doct. (Pedagogy). Louisville, 2012. 104 p.
12. Kirlanov T.G. [Classification of Active Learning Methods in Higher Education]. Molodoy uchenyy [The Young Scholar], 2010
13. Kolova S.M., Yaroslavova E.N. [Realization of Socio-Cultural Component in Foreign Language Education Content of Future Professional Preparation by Means of Information and Communication Technologies]. Applied Linguistics, 2014, vol. 2 (14), pp. 32–41. (in Russ.)
14. Kotlyarova I.O. [Model of the University Teaching Staff Readiness for International Cooperation]. Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk State Academy of Culture and Art, 2015, no. 2 (42), pp. 161–168. (in Russ.)
15. Kotlyarova I.O., Naydanova Yu.V. [Formation of the Personal Mobility in the System of Continuing Education: Review]. Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Ser. Education. Pedagogy, 2017, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 6–26. (in Russ.)
16. Tsytovich M.V., Boronenko G.F. Teaching Academic Writing in a Flipped Classroom.
17. Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Ser. Education. Educational Sciences, 2018, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 59–65. DOI: 10.14529/ped180208
18. Tsytovich M.V., Yakusheva O.V. Academic Writing Skills of University Teaching
19. Staff Formation at the Pre-Intermediate Stages of Language Training. 9th Annual International Conference on Technology, Education and Development, 2016, pp. 8160–8165. DOI: 10.21125/iceri.2016.0869
