TURKESTAN RESISTANCE MOVEMENTS IN CONTEMPORARY RUSSIAN HISTORICAL RESEARCH
Keywords:
Russian historiography, colonial policy, historical memory, contemporary approaches, oral history, historical analysis, historical justice, national consciousness.Abstract
This article analyzes the interpretations of the 1916 Turkestan uprising in contemporary Russian historiography. It explores the diversity of approaches to the topic in the post-independence period and reveals how historical events are evaluated from national, political, and social perspectives. The article compares the views of historians such as V. Buldakov, A. Ganin, T. Leontyeva, S. Abashin, and R. Pochekaev, examining the differences in their approaches.
References
Abashin, S. The Central Asian Revolt of 1916: A Collapsing Empire in the Age of War and Revolution. London: Hurst Publishers,2019
2. Khalid, A. (2006). The Politics of Muslim Cultural Reform: Jadidism in Central Asia. University of California Press..
3. Morrison, A. (2008). Russian Rule in Samarkand 1868–1910: A Comparison with British India. Oxford University Press.
4. Becker, S. (2004). Russia’s Protectorates in Central Asia: Bukhara and Khiva, 1865–1924. RoutledgeCurzon.
5. Булдаков В., Леонтьева Т. Война, породившая революцию: Россия, 1914—1917 гг. Москва, 2015. — 720 c
6. O’sha kitob 85 b.
7. Ганин А. Последняя полуденная экспедиции императорской России: Русская армия на подавлении туркестанского мятежа 1916—1917 гг. // Русский сб. Исследования по истории России. — Москва, 2008. — С. 152—214.
