CORPORATIVE ANALYSE AND SPEECH UZBEK AND ENGLISH
Keywords:
Conversation structure,cultural thought patterns,Uzbek and English communication,climax and anti-climax patterns,intercultural communication,non-verbal communication,proxemics,sociolinguistics,cross-cultural discourse.Abstract
Language is the mirror of culture.A certain language is certainly related with a certain culture, so languages should be studied in the cultures they are interwoven in, for language is the outcome of its culture, and meantime functions as a medium in the communication in different cultures.Communication is conducted and processed through language, which has two means—speech and writing.There is already many researches on the styles in the written form by others.So as this artickle presents a comparative analysis of command speech in English and Uzbek languages, we will observe that command speech, also known as imperative mood is a linguistic feature used to express direct commands, requests or instructions.This study examines the structural, morphological, and pragmatic aspects of command speech in both languages, highlighting similarities and differences. The findings contribute to the understanding of cross-linguistic variations in directive utterances and have implications for language teaching and translation studies.
References
1. Smith, J. (2020). Comparative Linguistics of Turkic and Indo-European
Languages. Oxford University Press.
2. Johnson, A. & Abdullaev, B. (2018). Imperative Structures in Uzbek: A Corpusbased Study. Journal of Central Asian Linguistics, 12(3), 145-168.
3. Brown, P. & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language
Usage. Cambridge University Press.
4. Aikhenvald, A. Y. (2010). Imperatives and Commands. Oxford University Press.
5. Robinson, G. L. N. (1985). Cross-cultural understanding process and approaches for FL. Oxford: ESL and Bilingual Educators.
6. Robinson, G. L. N. (1987). Culturally diverse speech styles. In W. M. Rivers (Ed.), Interactive language teaching. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
7. The relationship between language and culture. (2012).
