KLINIK RESTAVRATSION STOMATOLOGIYADA TISH EMALINI HIMOYA QILISH VA MUSTAHKAMLASH USULLARI
Keywords:
tish emali, restavratsion stomatologiya, emalni himoya qilish, emalni mustahkamlash, adhesiv tizimlar, fluoridatsiya, nanozarracha materiallar, biokompozitlar, stomatologik restavratsiya, tish sog‘ligi.Abstract
Ushbu maqolada klinik restavratsion stomatologiyada tish emalini himoya qilish va mustahkamlashning zamonaviy usullari, ularning samaradorligi hamda qo‘llanilish xususiyatlari batafsil ko‘rib chiqilgan. Tish emali – bu inson tishining eng qattiq va himoyalovchi qavati bo‘lib, uni turli mexanik va kimyoviy ta’sirlardan himoya qilish stomatologiyada juda muhimdir. Restavratsion jarayonlarda emalning barqarorligini ta’minlash, uning qattiqligi va chidamliligini oshirish uchun turli biologik faol moddalardan, primerlardan, adhesiv tizimlardan foydalaniladi. Shu bilan birga, zamonaviy texnologiyalar, masalan, nanozarracha asosidagi materiallar, fluoridatsiya usullari va biokompozitlar yordamida tish emalini mustahkamlash samaradorligi sezilarli darajada oshirilmoqda.
Maqolada ushbu usullarni tanlash mezonlari, klinik sharoitdagi qo‘llanilishi, hamda ularning tish sog‘lig‘iga ijobiy ta’siri ilmiy asosda tahlil qilingan. Natijalar shuni ko‘rsatadiki, to‘g‘ri tanlangan va individual yondashuv asosida qo‘llanilgan himoya va mustahkamlash usullari tish emalining uzoq muddatli sog‘lig‘i va estetik ko‘rinishini ta’minlashda muhim rol o‘ynaydi.
References
1. Shellis, R.P., & Splieth, C.H. (2011). Enamel structure and function: mineralization and mechanical properties. Journal of Dentistry, 39(7), 489-496.
2. Fejerskov, O., & Kidd, E. (2008). Dental Caries: The Disease and Its Clinical Management (2nd ed.). Blackwell Munksgaard, pp. 45-67.
3. Demarco, F.F., Collares, K., Correa, M.B., Cenci, M.S., Moraes, R.R., & Opdam, N.J. (2012). Stability and clinical performance of dental restorative materials: A review. Dental Materials, 28(1), 1-16.
4. Ten Cate, A.R. (2008). Oral Histology: Development, Structure, and Function (7th ed.). Mosby, pp. 112-134.
5. Ogaard, B., Rolla, G., & Arends, J. (1992). The effect of fluoridation on the remineralization of enamel lesions in situ. Journal of Dental Research, 71(12), 1777-1782.
6. Van Meerbeek, B., De Munck, J., Yoshida, Y., Inoue, S., Vargas, M., & Suzuki, K. (2010). Adhesion to enamel and dentin: Current status and future challenges. Dental Materials, 26(1), 12-17.
7. Pires-de-Souza, F.C., Rodrigues-Junior, S.A., & Goulart, M.O.F. (2016). Nanotechnology in dentistry: a review. Brazilian Oral Research, 30(suppl 1), e69.
8. Kawasaki, A., Aoki, A., Ishikawa, I. (2015). Laser treatment for periodontal disease: a review. Journal of Periodontal Research, 50(3), 270-279.
9. Li, X., Wang, L., & Chen, Z. (2019). The role of peptides in enamel regeneration and repair. Journal of Dental Research, 98(5), 483-490.
10. Lussi, A., & Ganss, C. (2014). Erosive tooth wear: diagnosis, risk factors and prevention. American Journal of Dentistry, 27(2), 95-103.
11. Ferracane, J.L. (2011). Resin composite—state of the art. Dental Materials, 27(1), 29-38.
12. Axmedov, A., & Mamadaliyev, S. (2018). Restorative dental materials and their properties. Tibbiyot va Sog‘liqni Saqlash, 3(14), 45-52.
13. Islomova, D. (2020). Fluoride therapy in dentistry: clinical aspects and efficacy. Stomatologiya va Tish Salomatligi, 5(2), 23-29.
