GENETIC ASPECTS AND DIAGNOSIS OF EARLY PREGNANCY LOSS

Authors

  • Xujamkulova Gulxayo Ibrohim qizi Author

Keywords:

vmiscarriage, genetic abnormalities, chromosomal abnormalities, aneuploidy, chromosomal microarray analysis, karyotyping, genetic diagnosis, recurrent miscarriage, genetic counseling.

Abstract

Early pregnancy loss (EPL) is a prevalent reproductive complication, with genetic abnormalities being a leading cause. This article reviews the genetic factors contributing to EPL, focusing on chromosomal abnormalities, single-gene mutations, and maternal genetic predispositions. It further explores current diagnostic techniques including conventional karyotyping, chromosomal microarray analysis, and molecular genetic testing, emphasizing their role in accurate diagnosis and clinical management. Understanding these genetic aspects is essential for effective genetic counseling, risk assessment, and improving reproductive outcomes for affected couples.

References

1. Rai, R., & Regan, L. (2006). Recurrent miscarriage. The Lancet, 368(9535), 601–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69181-0

2. Regan, L., & Rai, R. (2000). Epidemiology and the medical causes of miscarriage. Baillière's Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 14(5), 839–854. https://doi.org/10.1053/beog.2000.0093

3. Warburton, D. (2000). Cytogenetics of reproductive loss. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 91(1), 39–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/1096-8628(20000731)91:1<39::AID-AJMG11>3.0.CO;2-U

4. Liehr, T. (2019). Cytogenetic contribution to recurrent pregnancy loss. Molecular Cytogenetics, 12, 51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13039-019-0450-z

5. Sahoo, T., & Dill, P. (2019). Chromosomal microarray analysis in miscarriage and fetal demise. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 56, 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.08.011

6. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. (2012). Evaluation and treatment of recurrent pregnancy loss: a committee opinion. Fertility and Sterility, 98(5), 1103–1111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.06.048

Downloads

Published

2025-07-23